Monday, November 10, 2014

Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)

Gregory Sturges
A Short Biography on the Life of Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The poet, critic, and philosopher, Samuel Taylor Coleridge was born on October 21, 1772. Following the death of his father in 1782, he was sent to Christ Hospital, a London charity school, where he met Charles Lamb. In 1792, Coleridge entered Jesus College, Cambridge, but left to enlist in the Royal Dragoons in 1793. Following his discharge from the Royal Dragoons, Coleridge met Robert Southey. In 1795, through Robert Southey, Coleridge was introduced to Sara Fricker, the woman whom he would later marry. Within the same year, Coleridge would meet William
Samuel Taylor Coleridge by Peter Vandyke, 1795
Source: National Portrait Gallery, London
Wordsworth. The two formed a close friendships and, in collaborative effort produced, “Lyrical Ballads”. Lyrical Ballads was Coleridge’s most comprehensive poetic achievement. It included his most notable poetic works, “Kubla Khan” and “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”. However, conflict surrounding authorship over “Lyrical Ballads” caused rift between the two. Coleridge’s most notable friends: Southey, Thomas de Quincy, and Dorothy and William Wordsworth all describe Coleridge as temperamental and inconsistent, perhaps the effect of his drug addition to laudanum. Coleridge use of laudanum was the result of depression and a chronic rheumatic pains that plagued him throughout most of his adult life.
Coleridge’s philosophy and literary career were undoubtedly influenced by the works of Shakespeare and Milton. While traveling in Germany, Coleridge was captivated by the German transcendentalist movement involving Immanuel Kant and Jakob Boehme, and also the literary critic Gotthold Lessing. Coleridge was also religious, and wrote and produced works that demonstrated his belief in God and Judeo Christian laws, using them as a template to support his claims made against the British monarchy. Coleridge was much more of a philosopher and student of life than he was a poet. He was reverend by his contemporaries for his shrewd intelligence. His ideas and philosophies would influence many young Romantic and Gothic writers. Keats, Shelly, Byron are of the many writers who revered Coleridge’s philosophies, applying to their poetry the principles of the Primary and Secondary Imaginations.
With his health declining, Coleridge, sought relief abroad. He was a prolific traveler, but assumed it would alleviate his worsening condition. He also traveled to escape his unwanted marriage from Mrs. Coleridge. In the year 1806 the couple abstained from their marital commitment. Financially destitute, Coleridge spent the remainder of his life with James Gillman, a physician. From 1816 until his death, Coleridge was known as the sage of Highgate. He died on July 25, 1834. Coleridge, although his literary achievements suffered from his obsessive drug use and difficult personality, Coleridge managed to help found an entire literary genre. He redefined how poets and authors interpret reality. Coleridge, a figure of the past, still lives on through his literature.

Literary Book Review
In Modern Critical Interpretation: Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Harold Bloom provides an eclectic assembly of perspectives on one of Coleridge’s most notable works of poetry. The selections Bloom chooses represent what he describes as the best criticisms devoted to Coleridge’s The Rime of the Ancient Mariner in the past quarter century. In the section entitled Editor’s Notes, Bloom establishes the range of criticisms and there relation to other critics listed, and describes the contrasting and refuting elements within their arguments. The principle interest of the book appears to be didactic, as the contrasting views on Coleridge’s The Rime of the Ancient Mariner provides different methodologies and interpretations with which to address a work of literature. He notes that his introduction, “argues that the Rime is a parable of the Primary Imagination, rather than an allegory or ironic narrative of the Secondary Imagination,” which he claims, “is directed implicitly against” Robert Pen Warrens Christian symbolic interpretation. Bloom highlights the varying ranges of the differences, which can be expanded to include psychoanalytic, structural, and historical influences that are presented as themes suggested to have been instrumental when Coleridge’s conception of the poem. Structurally, Bloom is refuting them all on some level, but maintains the communal academic relationship that, when followed successively, reveals the social network supporting academic scholarship.
Bloom has provided his readers with a scholarly view of Coleridge, a shared view in which the differing themes presented across different perspectives collectively provide even greater insights into the professional and personal life of Coleridge. Thus, Bloom’s book is biographical in nature, but only when all of the individual works are viewed as a collective whole. Initially, I assumed that the selection process was random, perhaps even biased to a default, yet I could not deny the feeling of being informed of the major conventions inherent to Coleridge’s works. One learns not only of the differences governing the thought processes of scholars, but how effective academic writers treat their subject matter. The fact that he places an emphasis on delivering the best criticisms informs the reader that he means to provide a template that contrasts against ineffective academic scholarship.  Because Bloom presents an assortment of different scholarly opinions with very little commentary as to their relationship to each other, saving the editor’s notes, this review has had to focus on the selection process. This book is guideline, but it also demonstrates a process, an evolution of thought that is dependent on social interaction. In Blooms editorial notes, he highlights the process, summarizing the differing points of views that converge within academic scholarship on Coleridge, which reinforcing creativity and academic exploration.
My only complaint with this book is that Bloom does not conclude or tie the different elements together. He asserts and alludes to this application of the text, yet he does little in the end to follow up this expectations. The redder is forced to assume a greater deal on their own, which could lead to misinformed interpretations.

Works Cited
Beer, John. "The Paradoxes of Nature in Wordsworth and Coleridge." Wordsworth Circle.
Winter (2009): 4-9. Print
 Chandler, David. "Coleridge: An Early Claim That the 'Law of Association' Came from
Aristotle." Notes and Queries (1994): 338-39. 
 Foakes, R.A. "Coleridge, Violence and 'The Rime of the Ancient Mariner'" Romanticism: The
Journal of Romantic Culture and Criticism 7 (2001): 41-57. 
 Jung, Sandro. "The Body of Guilt in Coleridge's Rime of the Ancient Mariner." Trivium 37
(2007): 223-36. 
Leadbetter, Gregory. "The Comic Imagination in Lamb and Coleridge." Charles Lamb
Bulletin 159.Spring (2014): 11-19. 
 Morton, Timothy. "Taking Stands on the Later Coleridge." English Language Notes 34.June
(1997): 72-80. 
Murray, Chris. "Review Essay: 'Give It Up in Despair': Coleridge and Goethe's
Faust."Romanticism: The Journal of Romantic Culture and Criticism 15 (2009): 1-15. 
 Myers, Victoria. "Coleridge's The Friend: An Experiment in Rhetorical Theory." Journal of
English and Germanic Philology 86 (1987): 9-32. 
Sha, Richard C. "Romantic Physiology and the Work of Romantic Imagination: Hypothesis and
Speculation in Science and Coleridge." European Romantic Review 4.August (2013): 403-19. 
Thomas, Sophie. "Aids to Friendship: Coleridge and the Inscription of the Friend." European
Romantic Review 4.December (2003): 431-40. 
Woudenberg, Maximiliaan Van. "Coleridge and Kurrentschrift." Notes and Queries 259.March
(2014): 50-54. 
Barth, J. Robert. Romanticism and Transcendence: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Religious
Imagination. Columbia: U of Missouri P, 2003. Print.
Bloom, Harold, ed. Modern Critical Interpretations The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. New
York: Chelsea House, 1986. Print
Coburn, Kathleen. In Pursuit of Coleridge. London: Bodley Head, 1978. Print.
Gregory, Alan P.R. Coleridge and the Conservative Imagination. Macon: Mercer UP, 2002.
Knaap, Steven. Personification and the Sublime: Milton to Coleridge. Cambridge: Harvard UP,
1985. Print.
Matlak, Richard E. The Poetry of Relationship: The Wordsworths and Coleridge, 1797-1800.
New York: St. Martin's, 1997. Print.
Modiano, Raimonda. Coleridge and the Concept of Nature. Tallahassee: Florida State UP, 1985.
Morrow, John. Coleridge's Political Thought: Property, Morality and the Limits of Traditional
Discourse. New York: St. Martin's, 1990. Print.
Seamus, Perry. S. T. Coleridge: Interviews and Recollections. New York: Palgrave, 2000. Print.
Timothy, Corrigan. Coleridge, Language and Criticism. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1982. Print.
The European Graduate School. European Graduate School EDGS, 1997. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
The Literature Network. Jalic Inc., 2000. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
"Samuel Taylor Coleridge." Bio. A&E Television Networks, 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.
Schwarts, Christian. Academy of American Poets. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.

Friday, October 31, 2014

Lord Byron (1788-1824)

Maureen Johnson
Dr. Ashley Bender
ENG 5243
10 Oct 2014
Lord George Gordon Byron Research Guide
Lord George Gordon Byron (1788-1824) lived a difficult childhood, but grew up to write some of the Romantic era’s best known works that continue to be read and studied 200 years later. The son of Captain John Byron and his second wife Catherine, Byron was born 22 January 1788 in London (McGann). Byron’s childhood was marred by his father’s extensive debts that weren’t relieved by the captain’s death or by Byron’s inherited title of the sixth Baron Byron of Rochdale, an estate that was worn down and debt ridden. Byron also had a congenital deformed right foot that plagued him until he was financially able to have to receive treatment in 1799. Byron considered his deformed foot “as the mark of satanic connection, referring to himself as le diable boiteux, the lame devil” (Eisler 13). These childhood difficulties didn’t prevent Byron from his life experiences, whether it was traveling the world or physical activities such as swimming. Both of these were combined when in 1810 he traveled to Constantinople and retraced Leander’s swimming route on the Hellesport (McGann).
Byron’s poetry career began during his time at Cambridge, which he attended sporadically throughout his young adult years. His first book of poetry was Fugitive Pieces, which he published privately. At Cambridge, he met his lifelong friend John Cam Hobhouse, who traveled Europe with Byron leading to the writing of Byron’s first major work, Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage. Byron continued to write poetry as he became involved in multiple romantic relationships, including an affairs with married women like Lady Caroline Lamb, who famously described Byron as “Mad, bad and dangerous to know” (McGann). Byron scholar Jerome McGann suggests the same comments were given about Lady Lamb.
Phillips, Thomas. “George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron.”
Replica photo of Oil on Canvas.
The National Portrait Gallery. Web. 30 Oct 2014.
In 1813, Byron reconnected with his half-sister Augusta. Rumors of an incestual relationship with Augusta persisted, but McGann (citing Byron biographer Leslie Marchand) say there is little legal evidence to support the claim. In 1815, the poet married Annabella Milbanke and the relationship was short-lived, but it did lead to a daughter, Augusta (Ada). Annabella and Byron became legally separated in 1816 and Byron never saw them again. After their separation, Byron had a brief affair with Claire Clairmont during a visit with Percy Bysshe Shelley and Mary Shelly in Geneva. That union produced a daughter (Clara) Allegra Biron (McGann), but she died at the age of five.
After Geneva, Byron moved to Italy, where had more extramarital affairs and eventually settled into a long-term relationship with the married Teresa Guiccoli. While in Italy, his finances significantly improved and he was able to pay off debts that had plagued him most of his life. He also wrote Don Juan, a mock epic, which was considered so risqué that his longtime publisher was hesitant to publish, settling on printing it without naming an author or publisher. Despite its early controversy, modern scholars consider Don Juan one of Byron’s finest works. Byron spent most of the rest of life in Italy, until he decided to join with a group that was fighting for Greece’s independence. Byron traveled to Greece in February 1824, soon became ill and died 10 April 1824.
The Byronic hero, both a character used in his works and a public perception of the poet himself, remains part of the poet’s legacy. In defining Byronism, scholar William Harmon says that Byron created a persona that was  “a model of the mysteriously brooding, bitter, vaguely northern loner, sexually polymorphous, reckless and doomed, and always dangerous” (Harmon 70). Among the influences for the Byronic hero was Milton’s depiction of Satan in Paradise Lost. That influence was one of the reason’s that Byron’s contemporary Robert Southey called Byron a participant in the “Satanic School of Poetry” (McGann). Despite Southey’s criticism, the Byronic hero remains an enduring character type in literature and the movies with examples such as Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights, Rochester in Jane Eyre, Jay Gatsby in The Great Gatsby, and film noir detectives (Longman).

Works cited
“’Manfred and its Time’: The Byronic Hero.” The Longman Anthology of British Literature Vol. 2A, 5th Ed. Ed. David Marosch, Kevin J.H. Dettmar, Susan Wolfson, Peter Manning, and Amelia Klein. Boston, et al.: Pearson, 2012. p 747-748. Print.
Eisler, Benita. Byron: Child of Passion, Food of Fame. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999. Print.
Harmon, William. A Handbook to Literature, 12th ed. Boston, et al: Longman, 2012. Print.
McGann, Jerome. “Byron, George Gordon Noel.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford U Press, 2004-14. Web. 13 Oct 2014.

Book Review

Dennis, Ian. Lord Byron and the History of Desire. Newark: U of Delaware Press, 2009. Print.
In Lord Byron and the History of Desire, Ian Dennis argues Lord Byron used desire in his works as a means to explore identity. Byron’s works provide an understanding of one’s own desire as a sort of freedom from social constrictions, whereas unrecognized desire leads to victimhood. Using the work of philosophers Eric Gans and Rene Girard, Dennis defines desire as subjects who are longing to imitate models, which he calls mimetic desire. This mimetic desire is the thread he uses to connect Byron’s works through their characters, behaviors, or locations. He suggests Bryon’s use of mimetic desire shows the poet’s insight into the construction of identities, both of those who desire to emulate models and those who are resistant to the models created in the poet’s works. Each of these types of desires manifests in different characters in the books and sometimes helps the poet’s audiences identify their own desires.
Dennis examines mimetic desire through chapters focusing on specific Byron works, devoting chapters to Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage, the Eastern Tales, “Prometheus” and “The Prisoner of Chillon,” Manfred, Cain, and two chapters to Don Juan. For Child Harold’s Pilgrimage, Dennis says that the travel narrative takes readers on a virtual journey, allowing the audience to imitate the desire of experiencing travel (32). The identities of characters become further entangled in the Eastern Tales, The Gaior, Bride of Abydos, and The Corsair, which suggests that love triangles end in bloody conflict creating a person who is both a hero and a victim because the victors in those triangles never receive the love of the person whose affection they were trying to win (67). “Prometheus” and “The Prisoner of Chillon” represent what Dennis calls “metaphysical desire,” where there isn’t desire to emulate another, rather desire is internalized and focused on oneself (97). This same metaphysical desire can be seen in Manfred, who resists the influence of outsiders and focuses on his internal struggle (129).
Cain takes this internal desire and focuses on a desire for autonomy, which Satan exploits and used to control Cain. For Cain, “ … all identity and differentiation are submerged in the violent panic of proliferating mimetic desire” (145). Desire therefore takes control and erases identity. Dennis makes a similar case about the desire of autonomy over lack of control through the example of the marketplace in one of the two chapters on Don Juan. The loss of autonomy is the source of humor in Don Juan, which creates models and subjects (159). Part of that humor is the mocking of female desire, which shows how male and female desires are similar (170). In his second chapter in Don Juan, Dennis argues that Byron uses irony to explain how that awareness of the desire in oneself and others is a form of freedom (207). In the conclusion, Dennis suggests that Byron recognized that knowledge of desire was a freeing force and can affect every aspect of life (234).
Dennis’s theoretical explanations of desire and its origins is necessary to understanding its role in Byron’s work, but the book is often weighed down by those same theories. For example, his interchanging of the idea of metaphysical desire and mimetic desire is sometimes muddied, making it difficult to understand the overall theme about desire. Despite those shortcomings, the discussion of identity and how Byron shaped identities is the most salient in the book. As Byron is so closely associated with the “hero” that he created, an examination of how the poet’s constructed identities remain relevant. The idea that desire connects Byron’s works makes this argument seem even stronger. Dennis’s book could enlighten research on individualism and emotional elements of the Romantic poet’s work.

Selected editions of Byron’s work
Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann, seven volumes. Oxford: Clarendon Press/New York: Oxford University Press, 1980-1993.
Byron's Letters & Journals, ed. Leslie A. Marchand, 13 volumes. London: John Murray, 1973-1994.
The Complete Miscellaneous Prose, ed. Andrew Nicholson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
For more information on Byron’s original works, including publication dates and publisher information, go to the Dictionary of Literary Biography.

Eisler, Benita. Byron: Child of Passion, Food of Fame. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999. Print.
John Galt, The Life of Lord Byron. London: Colburn & Bentley, 1830.
Marchand, Leslie A. Byron: A Biography, 3 volumes released in 1957, combined into one volume, Byron: A Portrait, in 1970.

Byron journal
The Byron Journal, published by The Byron Society (, is available through Project Muse at TWU’s library site. The titles of articles in the most recent issue, 42:1 (2014), are:
  • “ ‘Our Mixed Essence’: Manfred’s Ecological Turn” by J. Andrew Hubbell
  • “Mischievous Effects: Byron and Illegitimate Publication” By Jason Kolkey
  • “P. L. Møller: Kierkegaard’s Byronic Adversary” By Troy Wellington Smith
  • “‘A Strange Summer Interlude’: Notes on a Lost Plaque” By Howard Davies
  • “Three New Letters to Byron” by Peter Cochran

Selected scholarly books on Byron
Bond, Geoffrey. Lord Byron’s Best Friends, from Bulldogs to Boatswain & Beyond. By Geoffrey Bond. [n.p. UK] Nick McCann Associates Ltd, 2013.
The Cambridge Companion to Byron. Ed. Drummon Bone. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2004.
Cochran, Peter. Aspects of Byron's Don Juan. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars, 2013.
---. Byron and Bob: Lord Byron's Relationship with Robert Southey. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.
---. Byron and Hobby-O: Lord Byron's Relationship with John Cam Hobhouse. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.
Goode, Clement Tyson. George Gordon, Lord Byron: A Comprehensive, Annotated Research Bibliography of Secondary Materials in English, 1973-1994. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 1997.
Hopps, Gavin. Byron’s Ghosts: The Spectral, the Spiritual and the Supernatural. Ed. Hopps. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2013.
Howe, Anthony. Byron and the Forms of Thought. Liverpool, England: Liverpool UP, 2013.
Marchand, Leslie A. Marchand. Byron’s Poetry: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard U Press, 1968.
McGann, Jerome. Byron and Romanticism. Ed. James Soderholm. Cambridge, Cambridge U Press, 2002.
Pomarè, Carla. Byron and the Discourses of History. Farnham, England: Ashgate, 2013.
Stabler, Jane. Byron. Ed. Stabler. London and New York: Longman, 1998. Print.

Selected scholarly articles from the past five years
Bari, Shahidha. "Listening for Leila: The Re-Direction of Desire in Byron's The Giaour." European Romantic Review 24.6 (2013): 699-721. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Bernhard Jackson, Emily A. “Swimmers, Trimmers, and Jacks of all Trades: Byron's Paradoxical Struggle for Poetic Dominance.” European Romantic Review 22.6 (2011): 833-45. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Bertonèche, Caroline. “Lord Byron's Eccentricities.” In and Out: Eccentricity in Britain. Eds. Sophie Aymes-Stokes and Laurent Mellet. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars, 2012. 265-275. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Beyers, Chris. “Byron.” Edgar Allen Poe in Context. Ed. Kevin J. Hayes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP, 2013. 251-259. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Borushko, Matthew C. “History, Historicism, and Agency at Byron's Ismail.” ELH 81.1 (2014): 269-97. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Britton, Jeanne M. “Written on the Brow: Character, Narrative, and the Face in Byron and Austen.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 34.5 (2012): 517-31. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Callaghan, Madeleine. “The Poetics of Perception in Southey's the Curse of Kehama and Byron's The Giaour.” Wordsworth Circle 42.1 (2011): 38-41. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Camilleri, Anna. “Byron's Arabesque.” Charles Lamb Bulletin 155 (2012): 73-83. Web.
Chatsiou, Ourania. “Lord Byron: Paratext and Poetics.” Modern Language Review 109.3 (2014): 640. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Chien, Jui-Pi. “Matthew Arnold's Reception of Hippolyte Taine: Lord Byron as ‘Touchstone.’” NTU Studies in Language and Literature 27 (2012): 25-46. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Cochran, Peter. “The Phantom Byron Book Sale Catalogue.” Byron Journal 41.1 (2013): 49-55. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Cohen-Vrignaud, Gerard. “Byron and Oriental Love.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 68.1 (2013): 1-32. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Crisafulli, Lilla Maria. “Poetry as Thought and Action: Mazzini's Reflections on Byron.” History of European Ideas 38.3 (2012): 387-98. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Edgecombe, Rodney Stenning. “‘Rappaccini's Daughter’ and a Lyric by Byron.” Notes and Queries 61 (259).1 (2014): 71-3. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Elfenbein, Andrew. “How to Analyze a Correspondence: The Example of Byron and Murray.” European Romantic Review 22.3 (2011): 347-55. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Ennis, Daniel J. “Byron in Ravenna: Laureate of Reform.” European Romantic Review 22.5 (2011): 601-23. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Falloon, Anne. “Byron's Week in Middleton.” Byron Journal 41.1 (2013): 15-25. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Fleming, Anne. “Byron and Montaigne.” Byron Journal 37.1 (2009): 33-42. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Franson, Craig. “‘Those Suspended Pangs’: Romantic Reviewers and the Agony of Byron's Mazeppa.” European Romantic Review 23.6 (2012): 727-43. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Frye, Lowell T. “Carlyle and Byron: Anxiety, Influence and the Choice of Inheritance.” Carlyle Studies Annual 27 (2011): 231-9. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Giles, Paul. “Romanticism's Antipodean Spectres: Don Juan and the Transgression of Space and Time.” European Romantic Review 25.3 (2014): 365-83. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Hegele, Arden. “Lord Byron, Literary Detective: The Recovery of Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s Long-Lost Venetian Letters.” Byron Journal 39.1 (2011): 35-44. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Hurst, Mary. “Byron's Catholic Confessions.” Byron Journal 40.1 (2012): 29-40. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Lansdown, Richard, and W. A. Speck. “Byron and Disraeli: The Mediterranean Tours.” Wordsworth Circle 43.2 (2012): 106-13. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Llewellyn, Tanya. “ ‘The Fiery Imagination’: Charlotte Brontë, the Arabian Nights and Byron's Turkish Tales.” Brontë Studies: The Journal of the Brontë Society 37.3 (2012): 216-26. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Luijk, Ruben van. “Sex, Science, and Liberty: The Resurrection of Satan in Nineteenth-Century (Counter) Culture.” The Devil’s Party: Satanism in Modernity. Eds. Per Faxneld and Jesper Aagaard Petersen. Oxford, England: Oxford UP, 2013. 41-52. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Minta, Stephen. “Letters to Lord Byron.” Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net 45 (2007). Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Mozer, Hadley J. “‘Ozymandias,’ Or De Casibus Lord Byron: Literary Celebrity on the Rocks.” European Romantic Review 21.6 (2010): 727-49. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
O'Connell, Mary. “‘[T]He Natural Antipathy of Author & Bookseller’: Byron and John Murray.” Byron Journal 41.2 (2013): 159-72. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
O'Neill, Michael. “‘Without a Sigh He Left’: Byron's Poetry of Departure in Childe Harold's Pilgrimage, Cantos I and II.” Byron Journal 41.2 (2013): 115-25. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Peterfreund, Stuart. “Taste, Byron's Cookbook, and the Secret Ingredients in the English Cantos of Don Juan.” European Romantic Review 23.6 (2012): 745-64. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Pielak, Chase. “Shady Beasts: Animal Transgression and Identity in Byron, Woody Allen, and Eminem.” Popular Culture Review 25.1 (2013): 83-96. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Rawes, Alan. “Byron's Romantic Calvinism.” Byron Journal 40.2 (2012): 129-41. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Shears, Jonathon. “‘D----d Corkscrew Staircases’: Byron’s Hangovers.” Byron Journal 40.1 (2012): 1-15. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Shinabargar, Scott. “Unexorcised Conscience: The Byronic Complex of Maldoror.” Intertexts 17.1-2 (2013): 113-28. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Simpson, Michael. “On Byron's Famous Fanes: Ruined Temples and Reformed Theatres.” Byron Journal 41.2 (2013): 145-57. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Slykhuis, Matt. “Beautifully Damned: Imagination, Revelation, and Exile in Coleridge’s ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’ and Byron’s Cain: A Mystery.” Religion in the Age of Enlightenment 3 (2012): 189-228. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Stansbury, Heather. “Bound by Blood: Incestuous Desire in the Works of Byron.” Byron Journal 40.1 (2012): 17-28. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Stauffer, Andrew. “Poetry, Romanticism, and the Practice of Nineteenth-Century Books.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 34.5 (2012): 411-26. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Taylor, Anya. “Catherine the Great: Coleridge, Byron, and Erotic Politics on the Eastern Front.” Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net 61 (2012). Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Taylor, David Francis. “Byron, Sheridan, and the Afterlife of Eloquence.” Review of English Studies 65.270 (2014): 474-94. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
Webb, Timothy. “Childe Harold's Pilgrimage: Annotating the Second Canto.” Byron Journal 41.2 (2013): 127-43. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
White, Adam. “Identity in Place: Lord Byron, John Clare and Lyric Poetry.” Byron Journal 40.2 (2012): 115-27. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.

Internet resources

Charlotte Bronte (1816-1855)

Kristina Barnes
Dr. Bender
Eng 5243
October 30, 2014
Charlotte Brontë (1816-1855)


Charlotte Brontë was born on April 21, 1816 to Patrick Brontë and Maria Branwell. She was the third of six children; Maria, Elizabeth, Branwell, Emily and Anne. Charlotte had a childhood filled with loss. Her mother passed away when she was five and her aunt came to help her father raise their six children. Charlotte and her sisters, Maria, Elizabeth and Emily were sent to the Clergy Daughters School at Cowan Bridge in Lancashire. While they were there because of the harsh regimen, poor food and typhoid fever Maria was brought home and passed away a few months later. After Elizabeth was sent home ill their father, Patrick, brought home Charlotte and Emily. Soon after their return Elizabeth passed away. Charlotte’s experiences and the bitterness she felt towards the school are reflected in her portrayal of Lowood School in Jane Eyre. From an early age Charlotte knew she was not going to have financial independence like her aunt so she must earn her own living. She lacked the self-esteem and was sensitive to her lack of physical charm gave her little faith in marriage and
Charlotte Brontë by George Richmond, 1850
Source: National Portrait Gallery, London
realized she needed to pursue her talents. She would take every educational opportunity that she had and self-improvement was important to her. She wanted to refine her knowledge in art and later become an artist then a poet. She had to later abandon these dreams to become a governess. After her experience at Clergy Daughters School she was educated at home for the next five years from her Aunt Branwell who taught Charlotte and her sister’s letters, needlework and French while Patrick Brontë taught his son Branwell and later his daughters the classics. In January 1831 Charlotte went to Margaret Wooler’s school at Roe Head. After eighteen months Charlotte returned home to share her knowledge with her sisters. Together over the next three years they read, studied, taught, and wrote letters to their school friends but above all she continued to write and create imaginary realms with her sisters. In July 1835 Charlotte Brontë returned to Roe Head as a teacher so her sisters could receive a free education. Charlotte remained employed for three years. Still wanting to be known for her poetry she sent some of her work to Robert Southey asking for his advice. He expressed the conventional ideas about women writers which didn’t discourage Brontë; he only recommended she not forget her real duties as a woman. In 1839 she began one of what would be many positions as a governess. It is thought that many of these events were the inspiration to characters in Jane Eyre. 

In May 1846 Charlotte, Emily and Anne financed the publication of a collection of poems under the names Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell. The pseudonyms were to hide their gender but keeping with their initials. In August 1847 Jane Eyre was published and it had initial success and favorable reviews. After Brontë began to work on her next novel Shirley her family suffered three more deaths; Branwell, Emily, and Anne. After Anne’s death Charlotte began writing as a way to cope with the grief of losing her siblings. The final noel published in Brontë’s lifetime was Villette. Like Jane Eyre Brontë uses experiences from her own life to create fictional events. 
In January 1854 Charlotte finally accepted a marriage proposal from Arthur Bell Nicholls and they were married that June. Soon after Charlotte became pregnant but her health declined rapidly and she died with her unborn child on March 31, 1855 at age 38. After her death The Professor her first novel she had written was published and a fragment of a new novel she had been writing has been completed by two different authors. 
The decades after her death Charlotte Brontë’s writing was becoming to be seen as inferior because critics claimed it was just a retelling of her life. More recently Charlotte Brontë’s writing has been seen as inspirational and as a criticism against political, religious and social standards of her time. 


Alexander, Christine. “Charlotte Brontë’s ‘Anecdotes of the Duke of Wellington’.” Bronte
           Studies 35.3 (2010): 208-14. Academic Search Compete. Web. 15 Oct.2014.
Armitt, Lucie. “Haunted Childhood in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Yearbook of English Studies
 (2002): 217. Literature Resource Center. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
Brown, Kate E. “Beloved Objects: Mourning, Materiality, and Charlotte Brontë’s “Never-Ending
 Story.”’ ELH 65.2 (1998): 395-421. JSTOR. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Braun, Gretchen. ""A Great Break in the Common Course of Confession": Narrating Loss in 
Charlotte Brontë's Villette." ELH 78.1 (2011): 189-212. Project MUSE. Web. 28 Oct. 2014. 
Burstein, Miriam E. “When did Charlotte Brontë Read Vanity Fair?.” Bronte Studies 37.2
 (2012): 159-162. Academic Search Complete.  Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Capuano, Peter J. "Networked Manufacture in Charlotte Brontë’s Shirley." Victorian 
Studies 55.2 (2013): 231-242. Project MUSE. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Clarke, Micael M. "Charlotte Brontë’s Villette, Mid-Victorian Anti-Catholicism, and the Turn to
 Secularism." ELH 78.4 (2011): 967-989.Project MUSE. Web. 28 Oct. 2014. 
Cohn, Elisha. "Still life: suspended animation in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette." Studies in English 
Literature, 1500-1900 52.4 (2012): 843. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Connor, Sharon.“Loneness’ in the Letters of Charlotte Brontë.” Bronte Studies 33.2 (2008):
91-96. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29. Oct. 2014.
Dalsimer, Katherine. "The Young Charlotte Brontë." The Journal of the History of Childhood
 and Youth 3.3 (2010): 317-339. Project MUSE. Web. 28 Oct. 2014. 
Fenton-Hathaway, Anna. “Charlotte Brontë, Marcy Taylor, and the ‘Redundant Women’ Debate.
 Bronte Studies 35.2 (2010): 137-148. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Gao, Haiyan. “ Reflection on Feminism in Jane Eyre.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies
 3.6 (2013): 926-931. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Hadjiafxendi, Kyriaki. "Women Reviewing Women in Nineteenth-Century Britain: The Critical
 Reception of Jane Austen, Charlotte Brontë and George Eliot ." Victorian Studies 54.2 
(2012): 328-330. Project MUSE. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
Herischian, Nazila. “Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargaso Sea as a Hypertext of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane
 Eyre: A Postmodern Perspective.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics & 
English Literature 1.6 (2012): 72-82. 
Inglis, Katherine. “Ophthalmoscopy In Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Journal of Victorian Culture
 (Routledge) 15.3 (2010): 348-369. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Jackson, Rachel. “Empty Letters and the Ghost of Desire in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Bronte 
Studies 35.2 (2010): 95-106. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Jung, Sandro. “Curiosity, Surveillance and Detection in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Bronte
 Studies 35.2 (2010): 160-171. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Kent, Julia D. “Making the Prude in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Partial Answers (British
 Women Writers) 8.2 (2010): 325-39. Literature Online. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Jung, Sandro. “Curiosity, Surveillance and Detection in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Bronte
 Studies 35.2 (2010): 160-171. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.

Lydon, Susan. “The Gendering of Art and Science in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Bronte Studies

 34.1 (2009): 20-30. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Marin, Ileana. “Charlotte Brontë’s Heron Scissors: Cancellations and Excisions in the 
Manuscript of Shirley.” Bronte Studies 38.1 (2013): 19-29. Academic Search Complete. 
Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Miller, Kathleen Ann. "Haunted Heroines: The Gothic Imagination and the Female 
Bildungsroman of Jane Austen, Charlotte Brontë, and L. M. Montgomery." The 
Lion and the Unicorn 34.2 (2010): 125-147.Project MUSE. Web. 29 Oct. 2014. 
Miller, Lucasta. “Sex and the Woman Writer: Charlotte Brontë and the Cautionary Tale of 
Letitia Elizabeth Landon.” Bronte Studies 36.1 (2011): 38-43. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Mullen, Richard. “Charlotte Brontë And William Thackeray.” Bronte Studies 36.1 (2011)
 Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Oct 2014.
Owsley, Lauren. “Charlotte Brontë’s circumvention of Patriarchy: Gender, Labour and Financial
 Agency in Jane Eyre.” Bronte Studies 38.1 (2013): Academic Search Complete. Web. 15
 Oct. 2014.
Parsons, Diana. “Charlotte Brontë and Henrietta Asseretti: Neighbouring Governesses?.” Bronte 
Studies 34.1 (2009): 67-75. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Pearson, Sara L. “Charlotte Brontë’s Poetics: A Study of ‘Pilate’s Wife’s Dream’*.” Bronte 
Studies 37.3 (2012): 194-207. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Pearson, Sara L. “The Coming Man’: Revelations of Male Character in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane 
Eyre.” Bronte Studies 37.4 (2012): 299-305. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct.
Peterson, Linda H. “Triangulation, Desire, and Discontent in The Life of Charlotte Bronte.” 
Studies in English Literature 47.4 (2007): 901-20. Project Muse. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Rea, Joanne E. “Brontë’s Jane Eyre. “Explicator 50.2 (1992): 75. Academic Search Complete.
 Web. 15 Oct. 2014. 
Reger, Mark. “Brontë’s Jane Eyre.” Explicator 50.4 (1992): 213. Academic Search Complete. 
Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Roberts, Michele. "How Eating Becomes a Metaphor in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë. (Food)."
New Statesman [1996] 5 May 2003: 56. Literature Resource Center. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
Sadiq, ebtisam. “Negation, Selection and Substitution: Charlotte Brontë’s Feminist Poetics.”
 English Studies 93.7 (2012): 833-857. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Jung, Sandro. “Curiosity, Surveillance and Detection in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette.” Bronte
 Studies 35.2 (2010): 160-171. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Stone, Laurie. “Why Charlotte Dissed Emily.” Literary Review 49.3 (2006): 63-70. Academic
 Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Sutherland, Kathryn. “Jane Eyre’s Literary History: The Case for Mansfield Park.” ELH  59.2 
(1992): 409-440. JSTOR. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Tomaiuolo, Saverio. “From ‘Emma’ to Emma Brown: Charlotte Brontë’s Legacies.” Bronte
 Studies 38.3 (2013): 195-205. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Twinn, Frances. “The Portrait of Haworth in the Life of Charlotte Brontë.” Bronte Studies 30.2 
(2005): 151-161. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Voskuil, Lynn M. "Acting naturally: Brontë, Lewes and the Problem of Gender Performance." 
ELH 62.2 (1995): 409. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Ward, Ian. “In Search of Healing Voices: Church and State in Charlotte Brontë’s Shirley.” 
Journal of Church & State 54.4. (2012): 603-624. Religion and Philosophy Collection.
 Web. 15 Oct. 2014.
Weisser, Susan Ostrov. “Charlotte Brontë, Jane Austen, and the Meaning of Love.” Bronte 
Studies 31.2 (2006): 93-100. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.

Wong,  Daniel. “Charlotte Brontë’s Villette and the Possibilities of a Post secular Cosmopolitan

Critique.” Journal of Victorian Culture (Routledge)  18.1 (2013): 1-6. Academic Search 
Complete. Web. 15 Oct. 2014.

Selected letter of Charlotte Bronte

Smith, Margaret, ed. Selected Letters of Charlotte Brontë. Oxford, GBR: Oxford University 
Press, UK, 2007. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 28 October 2014.

Web Resources
These two web resources about teeny tiny adventure books written by Charlotte Bronte and her brother. There are links so you can read each book digitally.
Book Review
In Charlotte Brontë, a psychological Study author Rosmand Langbride examines Charlotte Brontë’s life from a psychological stand point. He looks at her life from childhood, when she was a governess, her Brussels period and her marriage. Langbride argues that every agony in the Brontë family can be tracked back to her father. Langbride uses Charlotte’s letter and accounts from her novels to illustrate how mentally her father damaged both her and her siblings. 
In the first chapter Langbride describes the sad childhood of Charlotte Brontë and her siblings. Her father wouldn’t allow them to play like normal children and Langbride argues that their father’s view of children was an unfavorable one and that religion also kept his beliefs stern which was passed down to his children. Since their father wanted complete silence in the home the children didn’t have a typical upbringing. They would read the newspaper and discuss politics at a young age; Langbride argues that this would hinder the children in their lives later and that they were not developing the mental part of themselves that many children do during this time of their lives. It is an interesting insight to the Brontë family. Because Charlotte didn’t know how to play as a child when she later became a governess she didn’t understand the children she would be in charge of watching. Their tendencies were unfamiliar to her and she would see them as unruly. 
Langbride also argues that the time spent at Clergy Daughter School would under develop the girls physically. Charlotte eventually loses her oldest sisters because of the conditions at the school. Because of the way they were raised to suffer in silence the Brontë children never requested medical aid when they were sick until it was too late. So one by one Charlotte lost every single one of her siblings and she too would die at a young age. 
Another psychological impact on Charlotte from her father was the idea of a perfect man or husband. Since from birth the family regarded Branwell as a genius him and his father were the ideal in Charlottes eyes. This idea kept her from marrying someone while she was younger and eventually she married to a man like her father at the age of 38 and when she tried to have a child with her husband at this age she became since and died. 
Langbride provides a good argument for the Brontë family and their father being able to prevent all the heartache of their short lives. There were many habits formed by the family that could have prevented much of the heartache the family felt. 

Work Cited

Langbridge, Rosamond, 1880-. Charlotte Brontë: a Psychological Study. Garden City, N.Y.: 
Doubleday, Doran & company, 1929.
Alexander, Christine. “Brontë, Charlotte (1816-1855).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press Online. 2014. 28 Oct. 2014.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797)

Marsha Decker
Dr. Bender
English 5243
30 October 2014
Mary Wollstonecraft
Mary Wollstonecraft was an eighteenth-century philosopher, writer, and proto-feminist. She was concerned with individual rights and the social consequences of sexual inequality. The second of seven children, Wollstonecraft was born in London on April 27, 1759, to Edward and Elizabeth Wollstonecraft. Her grandfather was a successful weaver who left a small legacy. However, her father was an abusive man who spent his share of the legacy dragging his family around England and Wales as he tried, unsuccessfully, to be a gentleman farmer. According to Mary, her father was a drunken bully who often abused his wife and children.  Her mother’s submissive acceptance of her husband’s brutal treatment influenced Mary’s opinion that marriage was a form of female bondage.
In 1778, Wollstonecraft became the companion to Mrs. Dawson and lived in Bath. She returned home upon her mother’s illness in 1781. After the death of her mother, Wollstonecraft lived for a brief time with the family of her close friend, Fanny Blood. In 1783, she left the Blood family to take care of her sister, Eliza, and her newborn daughter. Eliza’s marriage was an unhappy one and by January of 1784, Wollstonecraft convinced Eliza to leave her husband and go into hiding. Her daughter was left behind and died a short time later.
Mary Wollstonecraft by John Opie, c. 1797
Source: National Portrait Gallery, London
In 1784, Wollstonecraft, her sisters Eliza and Everina, and their friend Fanny Blood, established a school in Newlington Green. It was in Newlington Green where Mary met Reverend Richard Price, who became a mentor, and Joseph Johnson, her future publisher and friend. In 1785, Mary travelled to Portugal to visit her friend Fanny who had left the school and married and was now expecting her first child. Mary did not enjoy Portuguese society and her unhappiness was deepened when Fanny and her baby did not survive childbirth.
By the time Wollstonecraft arrived back home, she found her school in financial difficulties. An advance from her publisher, Joseph Johnson, on her first book Thoughts on the Education of Daughters: with Reflections on Female Conduct, in the more important Duties of Life (1787), saved her from destruction. However, the school ultimately collapsed and Wollstonecraft turned to employment as a governess for Lord Kingsborough’s family. This short employment led to a trip to Ireland where Wollstonecraft would complete her first novel, Mary, a Fiction.
After Wollstonecraft’s return from Ireland, Joseph Johnson offered her a position as a translator and advisor for the Analytical Review.  In 1788, she completed Original Stories from Real Life; with Conversations, calculated to Regulate the Affections, and Form the Mind to Truth and Goodness and in 1789, The Female Reader: Miscellaneous Pieces in Prose and Verse; Selected from the Best Writers, and Disposed under Proper Heads; for the Improvement of Young Women which was published under the pen name of Mr. Cresswick, a teacher of Elocution.
In December, 1789, Wollstonecraft reviewed a speech by Dr. Price on English patriotism. Edmund Burke attacked Dr. Price’s speech in his 1790, Reflections on the Revolution in France, and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event. Encouraged by Mr. Johnson, Wollstonecraft came to his defense in her 1790 publication of the Vindication of the Rights of Men. The first edition was published anonymously, but the second was published under her own name and established her as a political writer. She followed this work with A Vindication of the Rights of Woman in 1792. In the book Wollstonecraft attacked the educational restrictions that kept women in a state of childlike ignorance with slavish devotion to male admiration.  She was especially critical of a society that encouraged women to be passive and overly concerned with their looks. She stated that women acted foolish and vain because society taught them to be. Wollstonecraft argued for a society where women could be educated in the same manner as men with a focus on the development of reason. Wollstonecraft argued this would make them better companions, wives and mothers. She also argued that the moral corruption of society was due to the acquisition of property and its ostentation display of it instead of the pursuit of reason and the protection of natural rights for both sexes.
In December 1792, Wollstonecraft traveled to France where she met Gilbert Imlay, an American merchant and author. She fell in love with him and posed as his wife in order to avoid the persecution of British subjects during the Terror.  Although Imlay and Wollstonecraft never married, they had a daughter, Fanny, in 1794. Her relationship with Imlay was often turbulent; at several times during their relationship, she caught him cheating on her. These encounters would lead to bouts of depression and attempted suicide. By 1796, the relationship was over and she returned to London.  
In 1796, Wollstonecraft renewed an earlier friendship with William Godwin. They became close friends and then lovers. When she found herself pregnant for the second time, she worried about public censure as an unwed woman and the lovers married. During their brief time together as husband and wife, Wollstonecraft worked on her last book, The Wrongs of Woman, or Maria. Wollstonecraft died on September 10, 1797 after giving birth to her daughter, Mary, who would grow up to be Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, the author of Frankenstein.
At the time of her death, Wollstonecraft was often vilified by society for what it saw as her scandalous personal life. Her reputation was further damaged after Godwin, out of love for his wife, published an account of her life in Memoirs of the Author of ‘A Vindication of the Rights of Woman’ (1798). The Memoirs reveals her turbulent history with Imlay, her multiple suicide attempts, and her illegitimate child. As a result, her reputation was destroyed and often used as a reason to dismiss her ideas. However, authors such as Virginia Woolf and suffragettes such as Margaret Fuller, Lucretia Mott, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, were all inspired by her work, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.

Book Review
Lyndall Gordon’s Vindication opens with a description of Mary Wollstonecraft’s arrival in France in December 1972. She recalls Wollstonecraft’s impression of the eerily silent city during the Revolution and before the beginning of The Terror. Wollstonecraft records the stillness of the streets, the abandoned stores, the drums of the National Guard, and the dignity of Louis XVI on the way to his execution.
Gordon’s book is the story of a remarkable woman who is intelligent, outspoken, passionate, egotistical, compassionate, resilient, and fiercely independent. She is a woman who wished “to see women neither heroines or brutes, but reasonable creatures”(2). Gordon presents a study of Wollstonecraft that moves beyond the traditional recounting of her personal life. Gordon seeks to present Wollstonecraft as a woman who tried out a variety of roles: the uneducated school teacher; unrequited lover; discarded mistress; the scribe; the fallen woman; the traveler; the pregnant wife, each time reinventing the roles in her quest for genius.
Gordon argues Wollstonecraft’s cause started with her childhood where she was raised by an alcoholic abusive father and an emotionally distance mother. The first part of the book describes Mary’s home life and how, as a victim of domestic violence and maternal neglect, she strove to prove herself, both to her parents and to society.  The reader finds out that through the generous help of benevolent adults such as John Arden and the Reverend, Mr. Clare, Mary was able to acquire a modest education. Gordon also describes how Mr. Clare introduced Wollstonecraft to Francis Blood who would become a close friend of Wollstonecraft and the person responsible for showing her the power of writing. Gordon argues the result of these friendships was the creation of a searching intelligence in Mary. 
Gordon’s book continues the journey of Mary Wollstonecraft through the rough periods of her life and gives the reader a glimpse of the struggles facing a single woman in the patriarchal world of eighteenth-century England. Gordon confronts and discusses the speculations surrounding Wollstonecraft’s affairs with Fuseli and Imlay as well as the influence of her involvement as an observer of the French Revolution and as a contributor to the heady philosophical arguments of her day. The result is a story of the adventurous, and often times tragic, life of a woman who is determined to rise above her situation and with intelligence, determination, and unique insight, bravely forge a groundbreaking path towards female equality and independence.
Additional Book Resources

Brody, Miriam. Mary Wollstonecraft: Mother of Women’s Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.
Gordon, Charlotte. Romantic Outlaws: The Extraordinary Lives of Mary Wollstonecraft and Her Daughter Mary Shelley. New York: Random House, 2015. Print.
Todd, Janet. Mary Wollstonecraft: A Revolutionary Life. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2000. Print.
Wardle, Ralph, M. Godwin and Mary: Letters of William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1977

Primary Sources

Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Man. New York: Prometheus Book, 1996. Print.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. New York: Dover Thrift Editions, 1996. Print.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. Letters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark (Oxford World Classics). Eds. Tonne Brekke and Jon Mee. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston.  New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1975. Print.
Wollstonecraft, Mary, and Gilbert Imlay. The Love Letters from Mary Wollstonecraft to Gilbert Imlay. Charleston: Nabu Press, 2010. Print.

 Secondary Sources 2004-2014

Coffee, Alan M. S. J. "Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life." Hypatia 29.4 (2014): 908-924. SocINDEX . Web. 28 Oct. 2014
Field, Corinne. “ ‘Made Woman of When they are Mere Children’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Critique of Eighteenth-Century Girlhood.” The Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth 4.2 (2011):198-221. Project Muse. Web. 26 October 2014.
Friedman, Dustin. “Parents of the Mind: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Aesthetics of Productive Masculinity.” Studies in Romanticism 48.3 (2009):423-447. Literature Resource Center. Web. 25 October 2014.
Freitas Boe, Ana de. "'I Call Beauty A Social Quality': Mary Wollstonecraft And Hannah More's Rejoinder To Edmund Burke's Body Politic Of The Beautiful." Women's Writing 18.3 (2011): 348-366. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Garner, Naomi Jayne. "'Seeing Through a Glass Darkly': Wollstonecraft and the Confinements of Eighteenth-Century Femininity." Journal Of International Women's Studies 11.3 (2009): 81-95. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 28 Oct. 2014
O'Neill, Daniel I. "John Adams Versus Mary Wollstonecraft on the French Revolution and Democracy." Journal of The History of Ideas 3 (2007): 451. Literature Resource Center. Web. 25 Oct. 2014.
Packham, Catherine. "Domesticity, Objects and Idleness: Mary Wollstonecraft and Political Economy." Women's Writing 19.4 (2012): 544-562. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Palumbo, David M. "Mary Wollstonecraft, Jonathan Swift and the Passion in Reading." Studies In English Literature, 1500-1900 3 (2011): 625. Literature Resource Center. Web. 25 Oct. 2014.
Reuter, Martina. “ ‘ Like a Fanciful Kind of Half-being’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.” Hypatia 29.4 (2014):925-941. Humanities. Web. 27 Oct. 2014.
Rzepka, Charles J. "Julie Carlson. England's First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley." Wordsworth Circle 4 (2008): 152. Literature Resource Center. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Sessler, Randall. "Recasting the Revolution: The Media Debate Between Edmund Burke, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Thomas Paine." European Romantic Review 25.5 (2014): 611-626. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Seval, Hale. "The Woman From The North Wind: Travel Letters by Mary Wollstonecraft/ Kuzey Ruzgarinin Kadini: Mary Wollstonecraft' In Gezi Mektuplari." Kadin/Woman 2000 2 (2011): 75. General OneFile. Web. 24 Oct. 2014.
Tegan, Mary Beth. "Mocking the Mothers of the Novel: Mary Wollstonecraft, Maternal Metaphor, and the Reproduction of Sympathy." Studies in the Novel 4 (2011): 357. Project MUSE. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Volkova, Inna. “ ‘I Have Looked Steadily Around Me’: The Power of Examples in Mary Wollstonecraft’S A Vindication Of The Rights Of Woman.” Women's Studies 43.7 (2014): 892-910. Humanities Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Waters, Mary A. "'The First of a New Genus': Mary Wollstonecraft as a Literary Critic and Mentor to Mary Hays." Eighteenth-Century Studies 37.3 (2004): 415-434. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 26 Oct. 2014.
Wilcox, Kirstin R. "Vindicating Paradoxes: Mary Wollstonecraft's 'Woman'." Studies in Romanticism 3 (2009): 447. Literature Resource Center. Web. 28 Oct. 2014

Online Resources

BBC Online is a UK based, international public service broadcaster. Their online presence, BBC Online, offers a comprehensive schedule of news, programs, articles, timelines, and archives on British History.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a scholarly reference resource that includes entries on philosophy and related disciplines with the goal to create an update reference source. All entries are maintained and updated by an expert or group of experts in the field. Each update is reviewed by a member of the editing board to insure quality and maintain academic standards.
            The Victorian Web is an academic and scholarly site that encourages multiple points of view and debate. It presents its images and text, including complete books and paintings, as part of a network of linked information.

Works Cited for Bibliography Section

“Mary Wollstonecraft”. Bio. A&E Television Networks. 2014. Web. 25 October 2014.
“Mary Wollstonecraft”. Ed. Stuart Corran.  English. University of Penn. N.d. Web. 25 October 2014.

Taylor, Barbara. “Wollstonecraft, Mary (1759-1797).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. 2014. Web. 28 October 2014.